top of page

Health and human services

Articles & Books

  • Bailey, K., Harris, St J., & Simpson, S. (2015). Stammering and the social model of disability: Challenge and opportunity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 193, 13-24    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.240


  • Bauld, C. (2015). Reflections on vulnerability and self-awareness. Occupational Therapy Now, 17(3), 21-22.


  • Bulk, L. (Nov. 2015). Disability disclosure: Thoughts from a student. Occupational Therapy Now, 17(6), 18-19.


  • Burghardt, M., Edelist, T., Fudge Schormans, A., & Yoshida, K. (2021). Coming to critical disability studies: Critical reflections on disability in health and social work professions. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 10(1), 23–53.   https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v10i1.743


  • Cooper, N. S., & Yoshida, K.K. (2007). Cancer screening behaviors among Canadian women living with physical disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,88(5), 597-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.014


  • Donaldson, A., Chabon, S., Lee-Wilkerson, D. & Kapantzoglou, M. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Reflections on speech-language pathologists’ image as advocates, activists, and aides. Psychology in the Schools, 54(10), 1285-1293.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.22083


  • Edelist, T. (2022). The disAppearances of deafness in early childhood diagnostic and intervention practices. In T. Titchkosky, E. Cagulada, M. DeWelles, & E. Gold (Eds.), DisAppearing: Encounters in disability studies (pp. 173-184). Canadian Scholars.

  • Edelist, T. (2016). Capitalising on cultural dichotomies: Making the “right” choice regarding cochlear implants. Social Theory and Health, 14(3), 293-311.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2015.34



  • Guenther-Mahipaul, S. (2015). “This unfortunate young girl…” Rethinking a necessary relationship between disability studies and rehabilitation. In K. McPherson, B. Gibson, & A. Leplege (Eds.), Rethinking rehabilitation: Theory and practice (pp. 191-207). CRC Press.


  • Hammell, K.W. (2009). Sacred texts: A skeptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740907600105




  • Healey, D. (2017). Eyeing the pedagogy of trouble: The cultural documentation of the problem-subject. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 6(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v6i1.334


  • Krupa, T. (2008). Part of the solution...or part of the problem? Addressing the stigma of mental illness in our midst. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(4), 198. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740807500404


  • Michalko, R. (2002). Estranged-familiarity. In M. Corker, & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 175-183). Continuum.


  • Nixon, S.A., Cockburn, L., Acheinegeh, R., Bradley, K., Cameron, D., Mue, P.N., Samuel, N., & Gibson, B.E. (2014). Using postcolonial perspectives to consider rehabilitation with children with disabilities: The Bamenda-Toronto dialogue. Disability and the Global South, 2(2), 570-589. https://hdl.handle.net/1807/73290


  • Odette, F., Yoshida, K.K., Israel P., Li, A., Ullman, D., Colantonio, A., MacLean, H., & Locker, D. (2003). Barriers to wellness activities for Canadian women with physical disabilities. Health Care for Women International, 24(2), 125-134.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330390170105


  • Thomson, N. (2015). The social construction of disability in occupational therapy: An examination of Muriel Driver Lectureships (1975-2009). (Publication No. 1032932058) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. TSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/1807/71347


  • Yoshida, K.K. (2018). Unbinding physiotherapy knowledge. Critical disability studies epistemology: Moving towards a socially-just physiotherapy profession. In B. Gibson, J. Setchell, D. Nicholls & K. Synne Groven (Eds.), Manipulating practices: A critical physiotherapy reader (pp. 221-241). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.


  • Yoshida K.K., Self, H., & Willis, H. (2016). Values and principles of teaching critical disability studies in a physical therapy curriculum– Reflections of a 25 year journey Part 1: Critical disability studies value framework. Physiotherapy Canada, 68(4), 315-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ptc.68.4.GEE2


  • Yoshida, K.K., Self, H., Willis, H., & Rose, N. (2017). Values and principles of teaching critical disability studies in physical therapy curriculum: Part 2. Critical disability studies pedagogical imperatives and teaching innovations. Physiotherapy Canada, 69(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.69.1.GEE2


  • Yoshida, K.K., Self, H., Renwick, R.R., Forma, L., King, AJ., & Fell, L. (2015). A value–based practice model of rehabilitation: Consumers’ recommendations in action. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(20), 1825-1833. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.981301


  • Yoshida, K. K., Willi, V., Parker, I., Self, H., Carpenter, S., & Pfeiffer, D. (1998). Disability partnerships in research and teaching in Canada and the United States. Physiotherapy Canada, 50(3), 198-205.

Videos

Website

Contact Us

Please note that this site is monitored monthly by volunteers, so it may take us a while to respond to your query. Thank you for understanding.

Thank you for your email. We'll get back to you within a few weeks.

© 2024 Mobilizing Critical Disability Studies for Change

This is the Mobilizing Critical Disability Studies for Change logo. It is a drawing of a tree with two intertwining trunks. One trunk is dark green and the other is orange. The trunks are surrounded by leaves of many colours: purple, green, red, yellow, and brown. Under the roots of the tree is the name of the group, "Critical Disability Studies for Change".   Critical Disability Studies provide the roots or foundation for the group. The intertwining branches represent our intersectional approach and the leaves represent diverse disability communities.
bottom of page